This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: allocate_objfile (NULL, 0)

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
Cc: gdb <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>, green at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:50:53 -0800
Subject: Re: allocate_objfile (NULL, 0)
References: <ro18yzmh1mh.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>

David Carlton wrote:

It would, of course, be possible to do
both options 2 and 3: assuming that we agree that option 2 is good,
then it would be up to the Java maintainers as to whether they wanted
to follow option 3 as well.

As far as I know, no-body is actively maintaining the Java gdb support.

Proper namespace support will of course be nice for Java.
Important to developers would be that gdb know that the Java class
java.lang.Integer class is the same as the CNI C++ class
java::lang::Integer.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

References:
- allocate_objfile (NULL, 0)
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]