RE: PR 207, 662

["Smith, Jonathan C5" <SmithJC5 at navair dot navy dot mil>]

Further, on attempt to compile, it fails in expect/exp_command.c with the
following errors:

cc-1515 cc: ERROR File = exp_command.c, Line 920
  A value of type "void *" cannot be assigned to an entity of type "int".

                master = ((mode & TCL_READABLE)?rfd:wfd);

cc-1164 cc: ERROR File = exp_command.c, Line 930
  Argument of type "void *" is incompatible with parameter of type "int".

                        if (-1 == (write_master = dup(wfd))) {

and various warnings.

Jonathan Smith

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Jonathan C5 
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:56 AM
To: 'Andrew Cagney'; Smith, Jonathan C5
Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com'
Subject: RE: PR 207, 662


Using the same definitions of CC and CXX on the gdb nightly tarball dated
today (20021118), the grep returned nothing (no results) with return value
of 1.

Jonathan Smith

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:18 PM
To: Smith, Jonathan C5
Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com'
Subject: Re: PR 207, 662


> On SGI 6.5:
>    It is still broken when built with GCC 3.2.
>    Setting the enviroment variable 'CC' to CC, the build breaks with
> 'configure: error: Could not find a term library' in '.../gdb'.

I just re-did a build on an IRIX 6.5 system using the 5.3 branch sources 
  I had:

     CC=/bin/cc
     CXX=/bin/CC

and configured with --disable-nls. Looking in gdb/config.status, 
configure found:

cagney@holodeck$ grep term config.status
s%@TERM_LIB@%-ltermlib%g
${ac_dA}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD}
${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD}
${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD}

Is any of this on your system?

Andrew


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:00 PM
> To: Smith, Jonathan C5
> Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com'
> Subject: Re: PR 207, 662
> 
> 
> 
>> Snapshot from 20020403, 5.2.0, 5.2.1.
>> 
>> I haven't taken a snapshot from the 5.3 branch as it takes a few hours to
>> transfer to the stand-alone network.  I shall do that tonight.  Is there
a
>> reason to expect this fixed in the latest snapshot when its been a
problem
>> for a long time (PR 207 is dated Tue Sep 04 09:18:01 PDT 2001) and I
don't
>> see any resolution information in the PRs.
> 
> 
> A month or so back MichaelS KevinB and I gave the MIPS on IRIX stuff a 
> ``good talking too', n32, n64 and o32 now work a lot better.  It was all 
> on 6.5 with the IRIX compiler, from memory 207 refers to 5.x.
> 
> Andrew
> 
>