This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Namespace testcases


David Carlton writes:
 > On 08 Nov 2002 11:08:47 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:
 > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:34:35 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
 > 
 > >> What do you think of pushing the namespaces.exp additions to mainline
 > >> gdb?  I would like to mark the failures with kfail and open
 > >> corresponding gnats PRs. 
 > 
 > > That sounds reasonable to me.  I've got several testcases involving
 > > namespace scope issues, anonymous namespaces, namespace aliases, and
 > > using declarations; I can post an RFA for them on the mainline as soon
 > > as there are PR's for them.  I'll put adding PR's on my To Do list.
 > 
 > > Maybe Daniel could come up with some test cases/PR's involving the
 > > fact that GDB doesn't know what namespaces types are defined in.
 > 
 > I've filed PR's for everything that comes to mind.  I probably missed
 > a few subtleties, but it's a start.  Hopefully next week I'll be able
 > to find some time to clean up the testcases that I currently have on
 > the branch and file a mainline RFA for them.

This is great. thanks for doing it!

 > 
 > >> So we can really know where we are....and have the satisfaction of
 > >> telling people reporting problems: "yeah, known bug, see PR/1234".
 > 
 > Not only can we tell people that, we can blame everything on GCC. :-)
 > 

he he he... that's the plan! :-) 
Seriously, maybe now we can start pushing a bit on them.

Elena

 > David Carlton
 > carlton@math.stanford.edu


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]