This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
set processor command
- From: Romain Berrendonner <berrendo at ACT-Europe dot FR>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:00:29 +0100
- Subject: set processor command
Hi folks,
I did a small comparison between gdb 5.0, 5.1 and gdb 5.2.1 (configured as
--target=powerpc-unknown-elf, solaris hosted) regarding the 'set processor'
command. The output is:
gdb 5.0:
--------
GDB knows about the following PowerPC and RS6000 variants:
ppc-uisa PowerPC UISA - a PPC processor as viewed by user-level code
rs6000 IBM RS6000 ("POWER") architecture, user-level view
403 IBM PowerPC 403
403GC IBM PowerPC 403GC
505 Motorola PowerPC 505
860 Motorola PowerPC 860 or 850
601 Motorola PowerPC 601
602 Motorola PowerPC 602
603 Motorola/IBM PowerPC 603 or 603e
604 Motorola PowerPC 604 or 604e
750 Motorola/IBM PowerPC 750 or 740
gdb 5.1:
--------
Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, powerpc:603, powerpc:EC603e, powerpc:604, powerpc:403, powerpc:601, powerpc:620, powerpc:630, powerpc:a35, powerpc:rs64ii, powerpc:rs64iii, powerpc:7400, powerpc:MPC8XX, auto.
gdb 5.2.1:
----------
Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, auto.
As you may see, the definition of the variants of powerpc vary considerably
from one version to another, and I would like to know what will be the
futur of this command: it looks like it is being deprecated, with less and
less variants supported. Is that true ? Or is it only that the existing code
is more generic ?
Thanks,
--
Romain