This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Breakpoint events: revisited

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Cc: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:45:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Breakpoint events: revisited
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020619082357.27660G-100000@is>

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Keith Seitz wrote:

Well, while working on converting MI over to use events instead of hooks,
I noticed that GDB currently only notifies the UI about some internal
breakpoints, not all of them.

So (beat, beat):

 Do we still want to expose _all_ internal breakpoints to UIs via
breakpoint events, or just some of them? Which ones?

My $0.02 would be that we should at least be consistent: either expose all of them, or none.

Yes.

I have a patch which adds _all_ of them, and removes the stupid creation
event from mention (removing the FIXME at the same time).


I tend to agree with this.

Andrew

References:
- Re: [RFC] Breakpoint events: revisited
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]