Re: Is this information correct?

[Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>]

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:07:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> What's this part about though?  I think it's really referring to gdb
> 5.1 instead.  5.2 should be fine.

Blah, its 6:30 am now... but we figured out what it was.
It was not gdb's fault, nor gcc's fault.  The "problem"
was that he was using -O2 and setting a break point
for main causes the break point to be set 4 bytes behond
'main' (the function pointer) which was already at the
start of some inlined constructor for which is was not
clear that it would be there (-O2 magic etc).
Anyway, my (independantly from gdb written) libcwd gave
exactly the same source file line number info ;).

I'll remove the remark that gdb-5.2 might not work with
g++ 3.1.  It works.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>