This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: operate-and-get-next is off by one

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 21 Apr 2002 14:02:45 -0600
Subject: Re: operate-and-get-next is off by one
References: <20020421010329.A17137@nevyn.them.org> <87wuv0rgs9.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20020421155208.A25490@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

>> p 1
>> p 2
>> p 3
>> C-n C-n C-n
>> C-o C-o

Daniel> You mean C-p, I assume...

Yeah, sorry about that.

Daniel> It would be very convenient if C-o worked at the > prompt
Daniel> also, since everything you type there makes it into the
Daniel> command history.

I agree.  I'm a bit surprised it doesn't, but I'm also a bit
unsurprised since the command-line handling code is really quite
baroque.  I'll put this on my to-do list, but I can't promise to look
at it in a timely way :-(.

Tom

References:
- operate-and-get-next is off by one
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: operate-and-get-next is off by one
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: operate-and-get-next is off by one
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]