This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [maint] sim and common
> "cgd" == cgd <cgd@broadcom.com> writes:
>
>
>>> While I agree with this point, I also like the idea of having a
> >> devil's advocate to approve sim/common patches. In the heat of the
> >> moment, it's easy to think of patches to sim/common to solve
> >> port-specific problems that are not in the best interest of all
> >> simulators.
>
> cgd> For what it's worth, I agree with Ben here. 8-)
>
> cgd> I'd _prefer_ to have others review my changes (as long i can
> cgd> get that review in a timely fashion)...
>
> Agreed--and as I stated, I don't believe there is any evidence to
> suggest that timeliness is an issue at this point.
In addition to reviewing patches, a maintainer is typically assumed to
be ``maintaining'' the existing code: fixing bugs, rewriting design
mistakes, adding new features, ....
enjoy,
Andrew