This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[maint] sim and common
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>,Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>,Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>,Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>,Chris Demetriou <cgd at broadcom dot com>, Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>,"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:08:27 -0500
- Subject: [maint] sim and common
Hello,
The sim/MAINTAINERS file contains:
> SIM Maintainers
>
> The simulator is part of the GDB project, so see the file
> gdb/MAINTAINERS for general information about maintaining these files.
>
> If you are considering contributing a patch, please see the file
> gdb/CONTRIBUTE. Patches to these files should be posted to:
> gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> Maintainers for particular sims:
>
> arm Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
> ppc Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> ppc Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
> mips Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> mips Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com>
> common Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
> common Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
>
(NickC worded this very well)
I'm wondering if it would be helpful for sim specific maintainers (at
least for sim/common based sims) to have implicit approval/write
permission on the sim/common directory.
Which reminds me, Stephane Carrez should really be listed as the m68hc11
maintainer. Unless, that is, GDB is going to assume that a GDB target
maintainer implicitly maintains the corresponding SIM.
Thoughts?
Andrew