Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions

[Iso-H <jd at ts dot ray dot fi>]

On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Iso-H wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  Is there any way to step over inline functions 
> > > >  when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option 
> > > >  perhaps?
> > > 
> > > Doesn't `until' do that?  That is, given that line 123 calls an inline 
> > > function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you 
> > > should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want.  Does that work?
> > 
> >   It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction"
> >   and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects 
> >   which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s)
> >   NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted.  Besides, 
> >   I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor 
> >   because gdb can't show that line to me.
> > 
> >   Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction"
> >   I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those
> >   f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached!
> > 
> >   All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves
> >   differently here...
> 
> Could you provide a small testcase, with source and a compile
> commandline?  By small I also mean including no system headers.  I'll
> try to see what has changed.

  It seems to be so that it is difficult to create 
  just simple "demo", but I'll try...

> 
> 

-- 

Iso-H