This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Software single-stepping and multi-arch
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:33:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: Software single-stepping and multi-arch
- References: <200202221318.NAA03358@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
No, you're not going crazy :-)
software single-step goes with the comment:
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be split in two. A target method
that in dicates if the target needs software single step. An ISA method
to implement it.
#
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that
inserts breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting
memory directly (as with rs6000).
#
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards. It should be asking
if the target can single step. If not, then implement single step using
breakpoints.
There are also gdb/120 and gdb/274.
> Should we separate the two out?
Yes!!!!
Andrew