This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: Cron <gdbadmin@sources> sh $HOME/ss/do-all-gdb-snapshots]


If the Internals Manual is a separate document that is usually used
and/or printed separately from the main GDB manual, and it is at
least, say, 20 pages, , it should have a separate FDL permission
notice and copy of the FDL.  This can simply be an @include fdl.texi
since the FDL is in the GDB distribution already.  If this is usually
just a chapter in the main manual, it doesn't need a separate copy of
the FDL.

As to the GPL - that is a political and authorial decision - is it
useful practically and/or politically to give people a copy of the GPL
in the manual?  I think RMS has said in the past that he thinks the
major GNU manuals should include a copy.  Ask him if you want, but it
is probably a good idea.  Not required by license, but a good idea.

- Brian Y., FSF


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]