This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Formatting of type output
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: drow at mvista dot com
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 22:42:22 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFC: Formatting of type output
- References: <20011206120205.A1278@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:02:05 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> That means that, regrettably, they are formatted differently; it is closer
> to the v2 demangler than to the v3 demangler, but different from both
> (classes get prefixed by "class" even in C++, for example).
Could you please post a few examples how they are different? It's
hard to reason about this without seeing some live examples; I guess
I don't know enough about this problem to figure this out myself.
> Does anything mechanical depend on the format of type output, besides our
> testsuite?
The documentation might include some examples which could need to be
changed. Obviously, this is not a grave problem, but since you
asked...