This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: 5.1 ERRATA file?
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know
>> > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file
>> > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file
>> > gdb/ERRATA?
>> I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS.
> Emacs has PROBLEMS.
Hmm, while I prefer ERRATA, I'm never one to pass up an oportunity that
lets me use EMACS as the rationale for a decision. -> PROBLEMS (ulgh).
I think BUGS would be confusing. A problem might be caused by several
bugs -> HP/UX.