This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?

To: hjl at lucon dot org
Subject: Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:43:45 +0300
CC: gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010917124710.A21992@lucon.org> <20010917161350.A25349@lucon.org> <20010917191357.A28300@lucon.org> <20010918135555.A12648@lucon.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>

> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:55:55 -0700
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> 
> BTW, people may be very disappointed at the current Linuxthreads
> support in gdb 5.1.

I wonder why was it necessary to make such a comment.  It doesn't add
any technical information to what you already posted, but it might
discourage people from working on fixing the problems.

Can we please stay technical and deviod of any unfriendly attitude?
Saying that such and such feature doesn't work is all people need to
try to fix the problem.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]