This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: z8k fixes
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: z8k fixes
- From: Christian Groessler <cpg at aladdin dot de>
- Date: 19 Feb 2001 11:49:08 +0100
- Cc: Christian Groessler <cpg at aladdin dot de>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, GDB Discussion <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
On 02/17/2001 02:03:00 AM EST Andrew Cagney wrote:
>Philip Blundell wrote:
>> In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Christian Groessler writes:
>> >I've got some fixes for the z8k assembler and disassembler,
>> >how can I get them integrated?
>> Send the patches (preferably in `diff -up' format) to this list.
>> If the changes are substantial, you will need to sign a form assigning
>> copyright to the FSF before they can be integrated.
>Could I also encourage you to include a GDB assignment and have a look
>at GDB. Right now GDB's z8k support is considered broken (it doesn't
>build) and is slated for removal :-(
I tried gdb 5.0 and it compiled (at least).
Since I haven't used gdb in this way before, please let me ask
whether I used it correctly:
I created a z8k coff executable "hello".
Start z8k gdb
-> gdb segfaults
So it looks broken :-(
My binutils assignment isn't finished yet, I will try to fix binutils
first (which with my patches seem to work quite well for me).
Later I might look into gdb then (if time permits etc..)