This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.

To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>, Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:43:00 -0700
Cc: jtc at redback dot com, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>, ac131313 at cygnus dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200102161928.LAA00929@bosch.cygnus.com> <5mhf1u9z9y.fsf@jtc.redback.com> <1010216201646.ZM12268@ocotillo.lan> <14989.36272.996420.519178@kwikemart.cygnus.com>

On Feb 16,  3:29pm, Elena Zannoni wrote:

> I am in favour of 5.0.1, which is consistent with what we did in the
> past.

Okay.  I believe that Eli mentioned this as well.

(I wonder if we could arrange for a script to bump the version number
on a weekly basis.)

Kevin

References:
- Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
  - From: J.T. Conklin
- Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
  - From: Elena Zannoni

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]