This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
- To: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
- From: "Peter Reilley" <micrio at mv dot com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:30:56 -0500
- Cc: "Jim MacGregor" <jamesm at macraigor dot com>
From: Fernando Nasser <email@example.com>
To: Peter Reilley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Jim MacGregor
Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
>Peter Reilley wrote:
>> The site is a work in progress, not everything is there.
>> I perhaps should have waited before announcing it
>> publicly, but some people asked about it. The
>> source is available. Email me and I will send it
>> to you, but it is changing daily. It will be on the
>I am not the Copyright holder. It is the Free Software Foundation.
>They have "given" it to the world, but under the GPL, what means that
>legally it is "owned" by the FSF.
>As I said, they distribute it under a license and we are free to use and
>redistribute it under this license. Violating this license in any of its
>clauses is as illegal as making illegal copies of a Microsoft product.
>As I was told, the first problem that befalls on someone who distributes
>GPL software and does not comply with the GPL terms is that this person or
>institution has the rights to redistributed it revoked for life (at the
>FSF discretion, of course).
>If you distribute the software by opto-magnetic means you have the option
>of making the source available by mail, charging a reasonable fee to cover
>media, processing and mailing. But if you make it available for
>you *must* make the sources available from the same site and anyone must be
>able to reproduce the binary you are distributing.
I offer the source free for the asking by email. When it is stable
it will be on the web site. I think that you are being a little picky here.
The code is being actively worked on. Perhaps my fault is in releasing
the binaries too soon.
>With regards to the DLL issue, the GPL makes clear exemption to the
>System and standard programing environment libraries that are distributed
>with an Operating System. It allows for nothing that are distributed
>separately or under a fee. As any Lawyer will explain to you, if it is not
>clear that you can do it, DON'T!
The libraries in question were derived from the DLL's available on
Windows. The Windows work was done by Red Hat. My work
was to do the same thing for Linux.
>I understand that you have helped set up this site and that you made it
>available with the best intentions in mind: helping people who wants to
>use this product (that I hear is quite nice) and the GNU tools. This is
>very commendable but you must first convince the Copyright holder and get
>an exemption from them or comply with the existing terms.
I believe that we are in complience now.
>You should inform whoever is responsible from that Web site of the terms
>conditions of the GPL and the legal consequences that can result of
>a software license in the United States of America.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fernando Nasser <email@example.com>
>> To: Christopher Faylor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Cc: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>> >> >There is nothing illegal about this site. I have done most of the
>> >> >Linux and Solaris code on this site. If you doubt this, ask them at
>> >> >their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported
>> >> >Linux and Solaris. The Wiggler is supported under Windows. Under
>> >> >Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported. The
>> >> >site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
>> >> >keep checking.
>> >> Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if
>> >> sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
>> >Furthermore, the GPL has explicit rules for Web sites: if the binary is
>> >available for downloading from a site, the same site must provide the
>> >sources that are necessary and sufficient to regenerate those binaries.
>> >Providing a link to another site where there are some sources is not
>> >And in this case the sources pointed to are not sufficient to regenerate
>> >binary nor equivalent to what was used as there are certainly changes to
>> >gdb code.
>> >Fernando Nasser
>> >Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: email@example.com
>> >2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
>> >Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
>Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
>2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
>Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9