This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 failures)
- To: Donn Terry <donnte at microsoft dot com>
- Subject: Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 failures)
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 10:52:52 +1000
- CC: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl, Peter dot Schauer at Regent dot E-Technik dot TU-Muenchen dot DE, kingdon at redhat dot com, gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Cygnus Solutions
- References: <309F4FC4705DC844987051A517E9E39B16EEFB@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Donn Terry wrote:
>
> Rebuild/regress is fine. Thanks, everyone.
>
> Donn
So. Does this mean I can delete:
--
Possible regressions with some devel GCCs.
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00475.html
gcc-2.95.2 outputs a line note *before* the prologue (and one for the
closing brace after the epilogue, instead of before it, as it used to
be). By disabling the RTL-style prologue generating mechanism
(undocumented GCC option -mno-schedule-prologue), you get back the
traditional behaviour.
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00510.html
This should now be fixed.
--
Andrew :-)