This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb] ld: aarch64: fix TLS relaxation where TCB_SIZE is used


*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT c1fc2d7ee590f3bc87ee79c36e7216b0b6bb054b ***

Author: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Branch: master
Commit: c1fc2d7ee590f3bc87ee79c36e7216b0b6bb054b

ld: aarch64: fix TLS relaxation where TCB_SIZE is used

TCB_SIZE is 2*sizeof(void *), which is 0x10 for lp64, and 0x8 for
ilp32. During relaxation, ld goes to do a replace:
bl   __tls_get_addr => add R0, R0, TCB_SIZE

But actual implementation is:
bfd_putl32 (0x91004000, contents + rel->r_offset + 4);

Which is equivalent of add x0, x0, 0x10. This is wrong for ilp32.

The possible fix for it is:
bfd_putl32 (0x91000000 | (TCB_SIZE<<10), contents + rel->r_offset + 4);

But ilp32 also needs w-registers, so it's simpler to put proper
instruction in #if/#else condition.

There are 2 such relaxations in elfNN_aarch64_tls_relax(), and so 2 new
tests added for ilp32 mode to test it.

Yury

	* bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c: fix TLS relaxations for ilp32 where
	TCB_SIZE is used.
	* ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp: Add tests for the case.
	* ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/tls-relax-ld-le-small-ilp32.d: New file.
	* ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/tls-relax-ld-le-tiny-ilp32.d: New file.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]