Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-04-07

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>]

Here are my Sunday Project results for 2001-04-07.

  Native Red Hat Linux 6.2:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     0
    # of WARNINGs                   0
    # of expected passes            6585
    # of unexpected failures        119
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          183
    # of untested testcases         19

  Native Red Hat Linux 7.0:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     0
    # of WARNINGs                   0
    # of expected passes            6635
    # of unexpected failures        114
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          182
    # of untested testcases         18

  Native Solaris 2.5.1:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     4
    # of WARNINGs                   2
    # of expected passes            6624
    # of unexpected failures        103
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          155
    # of unresolved testcases       34
    # of untested testcases         19

  Native Solaris 2.6:

    === gdb Summary ===
    # of ERRORs                     4
    # of WARNINGs                   2
    # of expected passes            6624
    # of unexpected failures        104
    # of unexpected successes       11
    # of expected failures          155
    # of unresolved testcases       34
    # of untested testcases         19

I ran the tests with FSF gcc cvs gcc-3_0-branch checked out on 2001-04-07
and FSF gdb cvs checked out on 2001-04-07.  I counted the ERROR and
WARNING lines by hand inspection of the summary files.

Native Solaris 2.6 has returned this week.  The results are substantially
the same as native Solaris 2.5.1.

All results are in Terf, http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gdb.cgi .
Note that Terf does not report ERRORs or WARNINGs.  Also, Terf has
problems with duplicate test names.

The merged results for all platforms contain 4 ERRORs, 2 WARNINGs,
and 128 FAILs.

Here are the merged ERRORs categorized by test script:

      4 TOTAL
      = =====
      4 gdb.c++/userdef.exp

Here are the merged WARNINGs categorized by test script:

      2 TOTAL
      = =====
      2 gdb.c++/userdef.exp

Here are the merged FAILs categorized by test script:

    128 TOTAL
    === =====
     31 gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp
     18 gdb.c++/classes.exp
     11 gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
      8 gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp
      7 gdb.c++/templates.exp
      6 gdb.c++/overload.exp
      6 gdb.c++/inherit.exp
      6 gdb.base/step-line.exp
      5 gdb.c++/namespace.exp
      4 gdb.c++/method.exp
      4 gdb.c++/derivation.exp
      3 gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
      3 gdb.c++/local.exp
      2 gdb.c++/annota2.exp
      2 gdb.base/structs2.exp
      2 gdb.base/selftest.exp
      2 gdb.base/return2.exp
      2 gdb.base/ending-run.exp
      1 gdb.trace/packetlen.exp
      1 gdb.stabs/weird.exp
      1 gdb.java/jmisc.exp
      1 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
      1 gdb.c++/demangle.exp
      1 gdb.base/exprs.exp

Changes from 2001-03-31:

  2001-03-31 total           4 ERRORs
  2001-04-07 total           4 ERRORs

  2001-03-31 total           2 WARNINGs
  2001-04-07 total           2 WARNINGS

  2001-03-31 total         128 FAILs
  2001-04-07 total         128 FAILs

There were no changes from 2001-03-31.

Last week there was a new g++ compilation bug with gdb.c++/userdef.exp on
Solaris 2.5.1.  This bug is still present, and is also present in Solaris
2.6.  The bug does not manifest on Red Hat Linux 6.2 or Red Hat Linux 7.
The bug is gnats bug gcc/2445, "undefined reference to `std::errno'".