This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug gdb/21350] ptrace: No such process
- From: "oshin.khandelwal at amdocs dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:37:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug gdb/21350] ptrace: No such process
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-21350-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350
--- Comment #9 from oshin.khandelwal at amdocs dot com ---
Hi,
[root@<server> ~]# ps -ef | grep -i bl1BTLServer
[user] 4613 1 0 Apr04 ? 00:00:41 bl1BTLServer -n BL1BTLSOR -f
REGULAR
[user] 10414 1 0 Apr04 ? 00:00:19 bl1BTLServer -n BTLQUOTE -f
REGULAR
root 26465 20983 0 17:05 pts/4 00:00:00 grep -i bl1BTLServer
[root@<server> ~]# cat /proc/4613/status | grep -i state
State: S (sleeping)
[root@<server> ~]# cat /proc/10414/status | grep -i state
State: S (sleeping)
[root@<server> ~]# gdb -p 10414
GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-60.el6)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Attaching to process 10414
ptrace: No such process.
Regards,
Oshin Khandelwal
Global SE&O
IT, Business Technologies Group
Contact : +91-9764073624
Desk: 2091-58406
-----Original Message-----
From: palves at redhat dot com [mailto:sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:27 PM
To: Oshin Khandelwal <Oshin.Khandelwal@amdocs.com>
Subject: [Bug gdb/21350] ptrace: No such process
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350
--- Comment #8 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
> Need an update on this on priority.
Please note this is an upstream tracker monitored on a volunteering basis, and
as such priority requests don't mean much here. If you need priority handling,
please file a bug with your vendor (RHEL/Red Hat) in this case.
> Do we expect the same output for sleeping processes as well ?
No.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.