This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gdb/21350] ptrace: No such process


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350

--- Comment #9 from oshin.khandelwal at amdocs dot com ---
Hi,

[root@<server> ~]# ps -ef  | grep -i bl1BTLServer
[user]   4613     1  0 Apr04 ?        00:00:41 bl1BTLServer -n BL1BTLSOR -f
REGULAR
[user]  10414     1  0 Apr04 ?        00:00:19 bl1BTLServer -n BTLQUOTE -f
REGULAR
root     26465 20983  0 17:05 pts/4    00:00:00 grep -i bl1BTLServer

[root@<server> ~]# cat /proc/4613/status | grep -i state
State:  S (sleeping)
[root@<server> ~]# cat /proc/10414/status | grep -i state
State:  S (sleeping)

[root@<server> ~]# gdb -p 10414
GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-60.el6)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Attaching to process 10414
ptrace: No such process.


Regards,
Oshin Khandelwal
Global SE&O
IT, Business Technologies Group

Contact : +91-9764073624
Desk: 2091-58406

-----Original Message-----
From: palves at redhat dot com [mailto:sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:27 PM
To: Oshin Khandelwal <Oshin.Khandelwal@amdocs.com>
Subject: [Bug gdb/21350] ptrace: No such process

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350

--- Comment #8 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
> Need an update on this on priority.

Please note this is an upstream tracker monitored on a volunteering basis, and
as such priority requests don't mean much here.  If you need priority handling,
please file a bug with your vendor (RHEL/Red Hat) in this case.

> Do we expect the same output for sleeping processes as well ?

No.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]