This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gdb/20287] X32 and "gdb_static_assert (sizeof (nat_siginfo_t) == sizeof (siginfo_t))"


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20287

--- Comment #7 from Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi at intel dot com> ---



It can be that x32 siginfo doe not implement the MPX specific part in it.
I.e. the _sigfault member  could be written as:
        struct
          {
            void *si_addr;      /* Faulting insn/memory ref.  */
            short int si_addr_lsb;      /* Valid LSB of the reported address. 
*/
          } _sigfault;

This is a first thought that comes into my mind.

Or we have new members not implemented yet in GDB.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]