This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug mi/20045] With mi-async on, -exec-continue outputs two (gdb) prompts
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:21:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug mi/20045] With mi-async on, -exec-continue outputs two (gdb) prompts
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-20045-4717 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20045
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gdb-7.11-branch branch has been updated by Simon Marchi
<simark@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cf2cd51217c0b99f5370708cc3932c12a1f4edad
commit cf2cd51217c0b99f5370708cc3932c12a1f4edad
Author: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed May 18 10:13:12 2016 -0400
Add mi-threads-interrupt.exp test (PR 20039)
Add a new test for PR 20039. The test spawns new threads, then tries to
interrupt, continue, and interrupt again. This use case was fixed by
commit 5fe966540d6b748f825774868463003700f0c878 in master, but gdb 7.11
is affected (so if you try it on the gdb-7.11-branch right now, the test
will fail).
New in v2, the test now handles mi-async on mode properly. The failure
was specific to mi-async off, but I don't think it's bad to test the
same thing under async on mode. I added a little hack when running in
async mode to work around bug 20045.
I also removed one continue/interrupt pair, as a single one was enough to
trigger the problem.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.mi/mi-threads-interrupt.c: New file.
* gdb.mi/mi-threads-interrupt.exp: New file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.