This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gdb/17764] Excessive seeking when reading debug data pegs the CPU @100%


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17764

dje at google dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dje at google dot com

--- Comment #2 from dje at google dot com ---
Yeah.  All those seeks are annoying, but are they really the main cause of the
slow down?

Also, I wouldn't say the non-.gdb_index case is not supportable.
It *is* going to be slower, but if there are fixable perf issues we may fix
them
(emphasis on "may").

If the cpu is pegged at 100% and in this case debug info reading is cpu bound
and not disk bound, how big is the shared library?
If it is relatively big, .gdb_index is definitely the way to go if you want a
speedup.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]