This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug breakpoints/16101] gdb.base/dprintf.exp agent-printf failures with non-Z0-supporting gdbservers
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:32:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug breakpoints/16101] gdb.base/dprintf.exp agent-printf failures with non-Z0-supporting gdbservers
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16101-4717 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16101
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch, master has been updated
via 88bbeca9d5e9429dbd2a11d754f24d649b8e5488 (commit)
from d23487918b315cccd04c2b60a7cf7775920caecb (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=88bbeca9d5e9429dbd2a11d754f24d649b8e5488
commit 88bbeca9d5e9429dbd2a11d754f24d649b8e5488
Author: Hui Zhu <hui@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon Mar 24 19:30:50 2014 +0000
Fix PR breakpoints/16101: gdb.base/dprintf.exp agent-printf failures with
non-Z0-supporting gdbservers
After a previous patch that was committed by Pedro (0000e5cc), trying
to set a dprintf with with a GDBserver that doesn't support agent
commands at all now throws an error. But the dprintf tests still fail
with some GDBserver targets because they doesn't try to handle the
case of the server reporting support for breakpoint commands, but not
be able to use those in combination with Z0 (because Z0 isn't actually
supported, for example):
FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 1st dprintf, agent
FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 2nd dprintf, agent
FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 2 (pattern 4)
Similarly for the MI test.
This patch makes the tests handle this scenario.
Tested with native, and native gdbserver on x86_64 Fedora 17.
Also tested with the native-gdbserver.exp board hacked with:
set GDBFLAGS "${GDBFLAGS} -ex \"set remote breakpoint-commands off\""
(actually, "set remote breakpoint-commands off" is presently broken,
so this was on top of a fix for that command.)
which results in:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 2nd dprintf, gdb
set dprintf-style agent
warning: Target cannot run dprintf commands, falling back to GDB printf
warning: Target cannot run dprintf commands, falling back to GDB printf
(gdb) UNSUPPORTED: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: set dprintf style to agent
gdb.sum:
Running target native-gdbserver
Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp ...
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf foo
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf 29
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf foo,"At foo entry\n"
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: ignore $bpnum 1
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf 26,"arg=%d, g=%d\n", arg, g
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 1
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: break 27
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 1st dprintf, gdb
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 2nd dprintf, gdb
UNSUPPORTED: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: set dprintf style to agent
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Set dprintf style to an unrecognized type
And also with the native-gdbserver.exp board hacked with:
set GDBFLAGS "${GDBFLAGS} -ex \"set remote Z-packet off\""
which results in:
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 3: Target doesn't support breakpoints that have
target side commands.
Cannot insert breakpoint 4: Target doesn't support breakpoints that have
target side commands.
(gdb) UNSUPPORTED: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 1st dprintf, agent
gdb.sum:
Running target native-gdbserver
Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp ...
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf foo
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf 29
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf foo,"At foo entry\n"
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: ignore $bpnum 1
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf 26,"arg=%d, g=%d\n", arg, g
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 1
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: break 27
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 1st dprintf, gdb
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 2nd dprintf, gdb
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: set dprintf style to agent
UNSUPPORTED: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: 1st dprintf, agent
PASS: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Set dprintf style to an unrecognized type
(One of the new comments mentions breakpoint always-inserted mode.
Actually testing with breakpoint always-inserted mode fails these
dprintf tests, due to the way they are written. But that'll take a
more substancial rewrite of the tests, so I'm leaving that for another
day.)
gdb/testsuite/
2014-03-24 Hui Zhu <hui@codesourcery.com>
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR breakpoints/16101
* gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Use unsupported rather than changing the
test pass/fail messages. Detect missing support for dprintf when
breakpoints are actually inserted.
* gdb.base/mi-dprintf.exp: Detect missing support for dprintf when
breakpoints are actually inserted.
* lib/mi-support.exp (mi_run_cmd_full): Return -1 if continue
fails.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 12 ++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-dprintf.exp | 45 ++++++++++++++++++------------
gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp | 1 +
4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.