[Bug mi/11499] New: MI Multiexec changes broke list-thread-groups

["frederic dot riss at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

Excerpt from the discussion at 
   http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2010-04/msg00040.html

797,561 9-exec-run
797,562 =thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="24272"   <--------- GDB gies group id
'i1'
797,562 =thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
797,562 9^running
797,562 *running,thread-id="all"
797,562 (gdb)
797,587
=library-loaded,id="/lib/ld-linux.so.2",target-name="/lib/ld-linux.so.2",host-name="/lib/ld-\
linux.so.2",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
797,591
=library-loaded,id="/lib/libc.so.6",target-name="/lib/libc.so.6",host-name="/lib/libc.so.6",\
symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
797,605
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",disp="del",bkptno="1",frame={addr="0x080483bd",func="main",\
args=[],file="../src/Helloworld.c",fullname="/work1/friss/workspace/Helloworld/src/Helloworld.c",lin\
e="15"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="0"
797,605 (gdb)
797,748 10-list-thread-groups i1
797,748 10^error,msg="invalid group id 'i1'"  <-------------- when we ask for
the same is, GDB rejects it
797,749 (gdb)

>From looking at the code, list-thread-groups expects integer PIDs as arguments,
which seem to clash with the new behavior of identifying thread groups by
group-id instead of PIDs.

-- 
           Summary: MI Multiexec changes broke list-thread-groups
           Product: gdb
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: mi
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: frederic dot riss at gmail dot com
                CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11499

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.