This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug c++/9144] gdb assumes 4 byte separation between 64 bit "long long" and "unsigned long long" stack allocated (not pointers) data member types within a C++ class
- From: "mstraub at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 19 Jan 2010 12:28:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/9144] gdb assumes 4 byte separation between 64 bit "long long" and "unsigned long long" stack allocated (not pointers) data member types within a C++ class
- References: <20051129155801.9144.mstraub@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From mstraub at gmail dot com 2010-01-19 12:28 -------
Subject: Re: gdb assumes 4 byte separation between 64 bit "long
long" and "unsigned long long" stack allocated (not pointers) data member
types within a C++ class
We as an org upgraded to a more recent version of redhat as well as
SuSE a while back. The problem disappeared at that time.
So its definitely not an issue on more recent versions of gdb.
If you haven't already, you can consider this bug unverifiable/fixed/closed.
Thanks
Michael Straub
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:08 PM, tromey at redhat dot com
<sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com ?2010-01-19 02:08 -------
> Waiting for feedback for 4 years.
> Also, I tried this with recent gcc+gdb, and it worked fine.
>
>
> --
> ? ? ? ? ? What ? ?|Removed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ? ? ? ? ? ? Status|ASSIGNED ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|RESOLVED
> ? ? ? ? Resolution| ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|WORKSFORME
>
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9144
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9144
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.