[Bug mi/10586] Anonymous unions/structs not handled correctly under MI
elethiomel at gmail dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Sat Oct 10 22:56:00 GMT 2009
------- Additional Comments From elethiomel at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 22:56 -------
The above session is via Eclipse/CDT, not manually controlled by me. It's the
output from the CDT set to verbose. If CDT is in fact issuing senseless
commands, I'll definitely file a new bug with them .
The version of Eclipse/CDT I use is Galileo-SR1. It's the version you'll get if
you choose "Eclipse IDE for C/C++ Developers" from http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/
The patch definitely works with the simple tests I posted. When I get into work
tomorrow I'll throw my main code at it (It uses anonymous structs/unions heavily).
As a matter of style, can I suggest names such as anon_union_1 or anon_struct_5
rather than just numbers?
Thanks for all your work on this. This fixes a major problem for me.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10586
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Gdb-prs
mailing list