[Bug mi/10586] Anonymous unions/structs not handled correctly under MI
nickrob at snap dot net dot nz
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Sat Oct 10 03:10:00 GMT 2009
------- Additional Comments From nickrob at snap dot net dot nz 2009-10-10 03:10 -------
Subject: Anonymous unions/structs not handled correctly under MI
> Thanks for looking at this. I have applied the patch to the latest cvs snapshot
> of GDB (7.0.50.20091009) and still get "Duplicate variable object name" using
> the posted testcase. Here's the debugger session.
Ah, yes. I got sidetracked and considered the equivalent C case below. I'll
have a look at the C++ case that you posted,
--
Nick http://users.snap.net.nz/~nickrob
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct
{
struct{
int a;
float b;
};
struct{
int c;
float d;
};
} test;
int main()
{
test bar = {{1, 2.2}, {3, 4.4}};
bar.a = 5;
bar.b = 6.6;
printf ("%d\n", bar.a);
printf ("%f\n", bar.b);
}
previously:
-var-create - * bar
^done,name="var1",numchild="2",value="{...}",type="test",thread-id="1",has_more="0"
(gdb)
-var-list-children var1
^error,msg="Duplicate variable object name"
(gdb)
with patch:
-var-list-children var1
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.0",exp="0",numchild="2",type="struct {...}",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.1",exp="1",numchild="2",type="struct {...}",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"
(gdb)
-var-list-children var1.0
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.0.a",exp="a",numchild="0",type="int",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.0.b",exp="b",numchild="0",type="float",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"
(gdb)
-var-list-children var1.1
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.1.c",exp="c",numchild="0",type="int",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.1.d",exp="d",numchild="0",type="float",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"
(gdb)
=
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10586
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Gdb-prs
mailing list