This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: symtab/1594: initialization of gdb failed before first breakpoint in main is hit (on HP/Compaq/Dec Tru64 5.1)
- From: Kees Dekker <kdekker at baan dot nl>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 24 Mar 2004 14:28:02 -0000
- Subject: RE: symtab/1594: initialization of gdb failed before first breakpoint in main is hit (on HP/Compaq/Dec Tru64 5.1)
- Reply-to: Kees Dekker <kdekker at baan dot nl>
The following reply was made to PR symtab/1594; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kees Dekker <kdekker@baan.nl>
To: "'gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com'" <gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com>,
"'nobody@sources.redhat.com'" <nobody@sources.redhat.com>
Cc:
Subject: RE: symtab/1594: initialization of gdb failed before first breakp
oint in main is hit (on HP/Compaq/Dec Tru64 5.1)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:25:41 +0100
Hi,
Excuse me. I acccidentally assigned the wrong category for this problem, and
resubmitted the problem for the gdb category (gdb/1595). You can ignore this
(symtab/1594) submission.
Regards,
Kees Dekker
-----Original Message-----
From: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com [mailto:gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 15:08
To: kdekker@baan.nl
Subject: Re: symtab/1594: initialization of gdb failed before first
breakpoint in main is hit (on HP/Compaq/Dec Tru64 5.1)
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `symtab/1594'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: symtab
>Responsible: unassigned
>Synopsis: initialization of gdb failed before first breakpoint in
main is hit (on HP/Compaq/Dec Tru64 5.1)
>Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 24 14:08:01 UTC 2004