This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: build/955: build failure with GDB-5.3: sparc-nat.c structureredefinition errors with sparc64-linux, glibc-2.2.x
- From: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 8 Oct 2003 09:08:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: build/955: build failure with GDB-5.3: sparc-nat.c structureredefinition errors with sparc64-linux, glibc-2.2.x
- Reply-to: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
The following reply was made to PR build/955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Christian Joensson <christian@j-son.org>
Cc: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa@redhat.com>, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build/955: build failure with GDB-5.3: sparc-nat.c structure
redefinition errors with sparc64-linux, glibc-2.2.x
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:02:57 +0100
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Christian Joensson stipulated:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:29:05AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Christian Joensson uttered the following:
>> > uhm, just tried gdb cvs HEAD, as of Sun Aug 24 12:01:38 UTC 2003, same thing:
>>
>> I'm back, at last.
>>
>> > In file included from /usr/include/asm/reg.h:7,
>> > from /home/chj/src/gdb/sparc-nat.c:38:
>> > /usr/include/asm-sparc64/reg.h:49: error: redefinition of `struct fpu'
>>
>> sparc64? Are you trying to build a 64-bit gdb?
>
> uhm, yes, to debug 64-bit binaries....
Oh, OK, so a lot of my suppositions are incorrect.
> uhm, a 64-bit gdb is not that easy to accomplish, I guess, but
> there'll be one in a future Aurora SPARC Linux, a development
> gdb64-5.2-ish src rpm is available:
sparc-nat.c hasn't changed much since 5.3 (although it's changing like
billyo on the SPARC branch of course). You could always grab the
gdb64-5.2 and see what's been done to sparc-nat.c in there, but it makes
more sense to try to forward-port the whole lot (diffing against
gdb-5.2-release, I guess, or see if the author posted a patch anywhere).
Of course doing this is a bit pointless if the author of that patch is
forward-porting it right now or kept it in synch with GDB CVS, which is
not beyond the bounds of possibility.
> ftp://auroralinux.org/pub/aurora/scratch
Snarfing gdb64, this could be interesting :)
--
`If you want a vision of the future, it is a wireless broadband network
feeding requests for foreign money-laundering assistance into a human
temporal lobe, forever. With banner ads.' --- John M. Ford