This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: kettenis at gnu dot org
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 2 Feb 2003 16:38:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- Reply-to: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR build/979; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 11:05:36 -0500
> I think that is a different problem - the dgux was folded into i386v4 so
>> really doesn't exist.
>
>
> I disagree; we still support the host. Obsoleting it isn't a matter of
> deleting the code, it's more a matter of undocumenting the support. I
> don't think this PR is fixed.
GDB supports SVR4 native systems. DGUX is an SVR4 native system.
Obsoleting SVR4 native is a new task.
Andrew