Re: [PATCH] python: Add qualified parameter to gdb.Breakpoint

[Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at polymtl dot ca>]

On 2017-12-13 08:17, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 06:42 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> > > So we either need to clarify that in the Python bits too,
> > > or some do some xref'ing.
> >
> > Agreed, I didn't like that wording either.  I had only found the
> > Linespec Locations page, which doesn't specifically say 
> > "fully-qualified
> > name", but mentions free-function (though it's in an example, not a
> > formal definition).  How is this?
> >
> > The optional @var{qualified} argument is a boolean that allows 
> > interpreting
> > the function passed in @code{spec} as a fully-qualified name.  It is
> > equivalent
> > to @code{break}'s @code{-qualified} flag (@pxref{Linespec Locations} 
> > and
> > @ref{Explicit Locations}).
>
> Thanks, that looks fine.
>
> (I thought I had replied earlier, but looks like I dreamt it.)
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves

Thanks, it is now pushed.

Simon