Re: [PATCH] python: Add qualified parameter to gdb.Breakpoint

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 12/08/2017 06:42 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:

>> So we either need to clarify that in the Python bits too,
>> or some do some xref'ing.
> 
> Agreed, I didn't like that wording either.  I had only found the
> Linespec Locations page, which doesn't specifically say "fully-qualified
> name", but mentions free-function (though it's in an example, not a
> formal definition).  How is this?
> 
> The optional @var{qualified} argument is a boolean that allows interpreting
> the function passed in @code{spec} as a fully-qualified name.  It is
> equivalent
> to @code{break}'s @code{-qualified} flag (@pxref{Linespec Locations} and
> @ref{Explicit Locations}).

Thanks, that looks fine.

(I thought I had replied earlier, but looks like I dreamt it.)

Thanks,
Pedro Alves