This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4] gdb: ADI support



On 7/25/2017 8:15 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
Weimin Pan <weimin.pan@oracle.com> writes:

+/* Per-process ADI stat info.  */
+
+struct sparc64_adi_info
+{
+  /* The process identifier.  */
+  pid_t pid;
+
+  /* The ADI stat.  */
+  struct adi_stat_t stat;
+
+  /* Linked list.  */
+  struct sparc64_adi_info *next;
+};
Use C++ STL list.  I suggested it on the v3 review.

I'm using forward_list to replace the linked list.

...
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc64-adi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/* Application Data Integrity (ADI) test in sparc64.
+
+   Copyright 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This file is part of GDB.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include "sparc64-adilib.h"
+
+#define MAPSIZE 8192
+#define SHMSIZE 102400
+#ifndef PROT_ADI
+#define PROT_ADI 0x10
+#endif
+
+static int
+memory_fill(char *addr, size_t size, int pattern)
+{
In general, the test case should follow the GNU coding standard too.

OK, done.

.....

+    return -1
+}
+
+if ![runto_main] then {
+    untested "could not run to main"
+    return -1
+}
+
+gdb_test "break [gdb_get_line_number "line breakpoint here"]" \
+         "Breakpoint .* at .*${srcfile}.*" \
+         "set line breakpoint in main"
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "continue to line breakpoint in main"
+
+##########################################
+set newadi "7"
+gdb_test "adi x shmaddr" "" "examine ADI"
Can you match the output?

Here are the results of running this new test:

% make check TESTS="gdb.arch/sparc64-adi.exp"
...
...

                === gdb tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. Using ~/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running ~/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc64-adi.exp ...

                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            7
...

+gdb_test "adi a/100 shmaddr=${newadi}" "" "assign ADI"
Likewise.

+gdb_test "adi x/100 shmaddr" \
+"0x\[0-9a-f\]+00:.*\t${newadi} ${newadi}.*" "examine new ADI"
+gdb_test "adi a/100 shmaddr=0x0" "" "reset ADI"
+gdb_test "continue" \
+         ".*Program received signal SIGSEGV.*
+.*ADI precise mismatch while accessing address.*" \
+	"continue to sigsegv"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc64-adilib.h b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc64-adilib.h
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..add026c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/sparc64-adilib.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
Why do you need a header?


Merged the header file into sparc64-adi.c.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]