This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Replace regcache readonly flag with detached flag

From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at imgtec dot com>
Cc: Alan Hayward <Alan dot Hayward at arm dot com>, "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, nd <nd at arm dot com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:09:29 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace regcache readonly flag with detached flag
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <B209EACB-8FC0-4702-9C4A-2BD54D393925@arm.com> <8637a0r9mq.fsf@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1707181340020.29593@tp.orcam.me.uk>

"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> writes:

>> I am not sure this replacement is reasonable.  The regcache can be
>> detached from target, and read-only or read-write.  The regcache can be
>> attached to target, and read-write.  I can't think of a case that
>> regcache is attached to target and read-only.
>
>  As a matter of interest: what if the target is `core'?

Hmm, it is read-only and attached to the target :-)

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

References:
- [RFC] Replace regcache readonly flag with detached flag
  - From: Alan Hayward
- Re: [RFC] Replace regcache readonly flag with detached flag
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [RFC] Replace regcache readonly flag with detached flag
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]