This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Document new hard requirement on GNU make


On 2016-11-16 11:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
OK.

Should we decide which oldest version of GNU Make we are willing to
support?  IOW, which features do we need for the build?

Thanks.

Probably, yes, but I'm not aware of the exact features/bugfix we have to rely on. From what I can see, pattern rules have been around since forever (I checked out a commit of make from 1993, and it was already in the doc). However, if there is a particular bug about pattern rules in some versions of make we want to avoid, I am not aware of it.

While trying to make GDBserver use pattern rules as well, I was reading this:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11455182/when-multiple-pattern-rules-match-a-target

I wanted to know which rule would get chosen if you wanted to build foo-ipa.o from foo-ipa.c, and you had the two rules:

%.o: %.c
  <generic compilation commands>

%-ipa.o: %-ipa.c
  <ipa-specific compilation commands>

With make >= 3.82, it would do the right thing (choose the second one), by choosing the rule with the shorter stem. Before that, it used the order of definition (the first that matches wins). So it would be nice for that reason to require >= 3.82, but it's also possible to work around if that's too recent.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]