Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Add test for user context selection sync

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 09/24/2016 09:13 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:

> +set main_break_line [gdb_get_line_number "main break line"]
> +set thread_loop_line [gdb_get_line_number "thread loop line"]
> +set thread_caller_line [gdb_get_line_number "thread caller line"]
> +
> +# Call PROCNAME with the given arguments, inside a with_test_prefix $procname
> +# block.
> +
> +proc with_test_prefix_procname { procname args } {
> +    with_test_prefix $procname {
> +	# Note: this syntax requires TCL 8.5, if we need to support 8.4,
> +	# we'll need to find an alternative.
> +	$procname {*}$args
> +    }
> +}

An alternative (not talking about TCL 8.5 here), would be to
go the gdb_caching_proc way.  That is, something like:

proc prefixed_proc {name body} {
...
}

.. and then define the procs that you want to prefix with
prefixed_proc instead of proc.

But either way is fine with me.

I mildly dislike using the proc names as prefix strings as it feels 
like implementation details leaking, but as long as the proc names are 
clear enough, I won't really complain about it.  Who knows, I may even 
grow to like it.  :-)

> +    # When using mi_expect_stop, we don't expect a prompt after the *stopped
> +    # event, since the blocking commands are done from the CLI.  Seting async to
> +    # 1 makes it not expect the prompt.
> +    set async 1

"Setting".

This is OK as is with the typo fixed.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves