This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mi: Restore original thread/frame when specifying --thread or --thread-group
On 16-08-05 01:26 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Yeah. The approach of extending the previous_inferior_ptid's scope a bit would
> avoid this, since it wouldn't need to revert back anything with a cleanup.
> Might end up being that once all the spots are identified, switching to
> the other approach ends up being a simpler patch.
Hmm maybe. I'll try to continue on that path and see what it gives. I really feel
like I don't know what I am doing, but I'll try anyway, that's how we learn I suppose :).
> Sounds like it. And don't we need a similar treatment for --frame ?
I don't think we do. --frame can only be used with --thread, and if --thread is specified
we will restore the state.