This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
[ Now with the testfile. ] On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:28:31 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Hello, this is not a regression for FSF GDB; but at least these Fedora versions gdb-7.8.2-39.fc21.x86_64 gdb-7.9.1-17.fc22.x86_64 gdb-7.10-29.fc24.x86_64 PASS the attached testcase p c40pt(1)^M $1 = '0-hello', ' ' <repeats 33 times>^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(1) p c40pt(2)^M $2 = '1-hello', ' ' <repeats 33 times>^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(2) while current FSF trunk b80c3053162ec5533e120ee4e4ed30296d4c5fb2 FAILs on: p c40pt(1)^M $1 = '0-hello', ' ' <repeats 33 times>^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(1) p c40pt(2)^M $2 = '\001\000\000\000\061-hello', ' ' <repeats 29 times>^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(2) Curiously the Fedora GDB versions are based on: [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00108.html https://github.com/intel-gdb/vla/tree/vla-fortran commit 511bff520372ffc10fa2ff569c176bdf1e6e475d (although I cannot find that commit hash in that github repo now) Couldn't the Intel patchset regress this testcase during its upstreaming? I haven't yet tried to really fix/debug it. Thanks, Jan
Attachment:
dwarf-stride-testfile.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |