This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: keiths at redhat dot com, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:53:28 -0700
- Subject: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Hello,
It's been almost 2 weeks since we branched, and there has been a number
of issues fixed since then.
On the wiki (https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.10_Release),
we have 1 TODO item left:
- Eval with KeithS regressions due to GCC 5.1 (regressions caused by
GCC rather than GDB)
For this one, the latest (private) update I got from Keith was
that GDB was likely in the clear - mostly GCC issues? Keith?
We still have 2 "Maybe"'s:
- [GCC review/Jan] PR compile/18485 (set debug compile: Display GCC driver
filename)
- [GCC review/Jan] PR compile/18486 (Add 'set compile-gcc')
If the reason for it being a "Maybe" is time, we can probably give you
a little extra time (see below).
I've moved the following item to the Exclude list, as per Pedro's
recommendation:
- PR gdb/18600 (After forking and threads spawning, gdb leaves newly
created threads stopped) (too delicate)
David Edelson reported that the buildBot was reporting a lot of
failures around the time we cut the branch. Has anyone looked at those
since then? When I did, I was looking at the waterfall view, and
several builds looked like they were failing right at the beginning,
so I didn't know what to make of it. Also, that's a lot of info to
grok, so I didn't have time to look further.
What I can say is that I've tested the branch with a number of
platforms, not as exhaustively of course, but so far, it looks
pretty good.
What I think we should do is give it another couple of weeks, and
see if other reports come up. It would be good, also, if we had
some info about the buildBOT failures, and whether the release
might be affected by any regression it found.
So, I propose a re-sync on Aug 3rd.
--
Joel