This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, dje at google dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, ARistovski at qnx dot com
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:38:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150614192542 dot 18346 dot 87859 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20150614192655 dot 18346 dot 17075 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20150621101644 dot GA12733 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <CADPb22TH5nfFSkCzW9cCiHuoJFAG+P5z=qZawgwGUgYQ5kfd5Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150623204702 dot GA2156 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <559D3749 dot 9010200 at redhat dot com> <20150712190921 dot GA8682 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20150712192911 dot GB12553 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83vbdp8846 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <55A39439 dot 1090803 at redhat dot com>
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:34:33 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> As the plan is for the feature to apply to the main executable too,
> it's better that "solib" isn't part of the setting name. I agree
> that "validate-build-id" sounds better than "build-id-validation".
OK, so validate-build-id or solib-validate-build-id.
Just this series being approved is still only for shlib and I do not yet have
completely finished the second series for all binaries; although 7.10 is
branched so till 7.11 there is now really enough time to have it all.
So I do not know if I should call it in this shlib-only first series as
validate-build-id or as solib-validate-build-id.
Jan