This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 7.9.90 available for testing
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:33:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: GDB 7.9.90 available for testing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvnykYB_ObOPQm7dD2h_8zhhraEAt6MimdBu=4G2P9qCg3eg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150709232141 dot GA7406 at adacore dot com> <CAGWvnyn342DKXnOdh+un86NaZaQ6d-Dd+XdSfEK1nNn3+OhL6Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150710034255 dot GB7406 at adacore dot com> <CAGWvnymxrXhGwC5oxXU_LpKhvY-KdsqgzEwihAV4ssS_Lekv6Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <559FD7C6 dot 2060502 at redhat dot com> <CAGWvnynk6gw4jjtYF0j=8AGEnYVrz4V4P6r0cinYxpbOhZv4Zg at mail dot gmail dot com> <559FE003 dot 5000205 at redhat dot com> <CAGWvnymcoXTD_GThKKaKXchh1nif1Gqz0bLY0hsFn13pUwR1Yg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 07/10/2015 04:25 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Yes, I was not requesting "green". Because we do have the buildbots
> available, I thought that it was important to understand the variable
> failures or instability before a release. If all of the failures on
> primary platforms are due to race conditions, then they're understood.
Agreed, but what makes you think people aren't doing that?
We have a wiki page to track issues that need to be fixed before
the release, and I'm sure Joel will not release without first
asking the community if there are other issues people know
should be addressed.
Reminder: anyone, if there are issues that need fixing that are
not on the wiki page, please list them there so we don't forget:
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.10_Release
Thanks,
Pedro Alves