This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Several regressions and we branch soon.
- From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>
- To: Andreas Arnez <arnez at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:20:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: Several regressions and we branch soon.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CADPb22SYnN52pqR+1UtR_Vr-1Yxzmx=OyMgnCD-OMcCL1GwAYg at mail dot gmail dot com> <86r3p1queo dot fsf at gmail dot com> <87lhf8yz90 dot fsf at br87z6lw dot de dot ibm dot com> <CADPb22TCA_uDCwLksVTo=2QB+OapBuPfAB2aSaok1ZdxDCU0Bw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87a8vnzmzy dot fsf at br87z6lw dot de dot ibm dot com>
Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Right, this was considered in the patch. But only what I've actually
> seen fail in my testing is marked as KFAIL. Since more FAILs are
> observed now, maybe we could mark them as KFAIL as well. Or skip them
> altogether, like in the patch below. WDYT?
I am inclined to skip them altogether, but I think we need skip more.
With your patch applied, I still see them in gdb.sum
KFAIL: gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: call add_some_intvecs (PRMS: gdb/18537)
KPASS: gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: call add_many_charvecs (PRMS gdb/18537)
KFAIL: gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: call add_various_floatvecs (PRMS: gdb/18537)
KFAIL: gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: call add_structvecs (PRMS: gdb/18537)
KFAIL: gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: skip remaining vector ABI tests on this arch (PRMS: gdb/18537)
KPASS is confusing here. I'd like to skip all of them on x86 and emit
UNSUPPORTED in gdb.sum, because we've already know that vector infcall
doesn't support on x86, UNSUPPORTED is better than KFAIL, IMO.
--
Yao (éå)