This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [obv] compile-print.exp: xfail->kfail for '@' GDB array operator


On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:19:05 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> the plan isn't to remove the "standard 'print' command", right?
> [The print (output, etc.) commands would either use the builtin
> support or compile print.]

Sure GCC will probably never become a hard requirement for GDB.

I think there could be:
  set compile print never = current state
  set compile print always = never use internal GDB evaluation
  set compile print preferred = first try GCC then GDB evaluation
   - IMO to be the default (as long as GCC is available)
  set compile print deferred = first try GDB then GCC evaluation

But the setting above has never been implemented/posted/discussed.


Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]