This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 03/23] sim/erc32: Perform pseudo-init of system if binary starts from non-zero address.


On 18 Feb 2015 15:40, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 09:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 17 Feb 2015 08:44, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> >> +extern struct pstate sregs;
> >> +
> >> +void
> >> +boot_init ()
> > 
> > also looks like this is missing an update to a header to add the prototype ?
> 
> This is done in patch (17/23).

ok, but patches things really should be standalone.  although your series is
pretty good already in terms of splitting things apart.

> >> +{
> >> +    mec_write(MEC_WCR, 0);	/* zero waitstates */
> >> +    mec_write(MEC_TRAPD, 0);	/* turn off watch-dog */
> >> +    mec_write(MEC_RTC_SCALER, sregs.freq-1); /* generate 1 MHz RTC tick */
> >> +    mec_write(MEC_MEMCFG, (3 << 18) | (4 << 10)); /* 1 MB ROM, 4 MB RAM */
> >> +    sregs.wim = 2;
> >> +    sregs.psr = 0x110010e0;
> >> +    sregs.r[30] = RAM_END;
> >> +    sregs.r[14] = sregs.r[30] - 96*4;
> >> +    mec_mcr |= 1;		/* power-down enabled */
> >> +}
> > 
> > why isn't sregs passed in as an arg ?  looks like both callers have a pointer to 
> > it already.
> 
> I am saving this for next major update - SMP support. All globals will then
> be removed and the full cpu state will be in a struct that is passed to the
> simulation engine. In this way I can simulate multiple cpu's.

can't this particular bit be done already ?  or is the global pointer diff from
the local one ?
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]