This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 09/36] floatformat.h: Wrap in extern "C".
- From: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:29:10 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/36] floatformat.h: Wrap in extern "C".
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1423524046-20605-1-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <1423524046-20605-10-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <CA+=Sn1npOYOeTU6ShGk50Vcy=ZpuYMjUfDac0gXWU20grzyoyw at mail dot gmail dot com> <54D94780 dot 9050606 at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 11:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Just like libiberty.h. So that C++ programs, such as GDB when built
>>> as a C++ program, can use it.
>>
>> Why is not needed for GCC building with C++ compiler?
>
> Because it doesn't include it.
>
> The header of the file claims it is part of GDB, though MAINTAINERS
> nowadays says that everything under include/ is owned by GCC.
Wait, what?
The actual wording is:
"The rule is that if the file exists in the gcc tree then gcc owns it."
It originated from this thread,
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2013-11/msg00025.html
That's not the first message in the thread, but that's where
I remember wanting to see something written down.
Perhaps kinda unfortunate for things like include/gdb/gdb-index.h.
But at least it's a rule that can be expressed in one sentence,
and I don't think it's been a problem.