This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver
- From: Michael Eager <eager at eagerm dot com>
- To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit dot kumar dot agarwal at xilinx dot com>, Michael Eager <eager at eagercon dot com>, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Vinod Kathail <vinodk at xilinx dot com>, Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum at xilinx dot com>, Nagaraju Mekala <nmekala at xilinx dot com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:10:18 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <25de23b98e054fd291ea232d10f2800c at BN1BFFO11FD018 dot protection dot gbl> <5436B7D0 dot 9060004 at eagercon dot com> <d0a23ff7601a4dbcab91d5b680bc2e13 at BY2FFO11FD017 dot protection dot gbl> <543E7630 dot 5060001 at redhat dot com> <99de529c620a4bb0a118a9fc39ae6ad0 at BY2FFO11FD008 dot protection dot gbl> <548F2240 dot 7020700 at redhat dot com> <548F24CA dot 7090503 at eagercon dot com> <03105cda11564e60a2ef365cbe36688e at BY2FFO11FD023 dot protection dot gbl>
On 12/18/14 00:58, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Eager [mailto:eager@eagercon.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:44 PM
To: Pedro Alves; Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Joel Brobecker
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Vinod Kathail; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver
On 12/15/14 10:02, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 10/17/2014 08:22 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
Gdb.base gdb testsuite is run and here is the status of gdb testsuite run for gdb.base.
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 7804
# of unexpected failures 2263
Over 2000 unexpected failures is not very reassuring though.
Have you looked at the logs to get an idea of what might be broken?
Bare metal test results show ~350 failures. The gdbserver results should be similar.
push_dummy_code feature is not implemented in Microblaze port.
The total failure due to this functionality is 592 in bare metal. Of this gdb.base failures are 357.
May we know what you meant by ~350 failures.
Sorry, I was looking at GCC failures.
Running gdb regression test on bare metal gives the following:
# of expected passes 6481
# of unexpected failures 1053
# of expected failures 6
# of known failures 21
# of unresolved testcases 12
# of untested testcases 31
# of unsupported tests 21
That's 1053 failures, compared to the 2263 using gdbserver.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077