This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 7/9] Rewrite lookup_static_symbol to use gdbarch routine
- From: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- To: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:23:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Rewrite lookup_static_symbol to use gdbarch routine
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <m3tx2qjee1 dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <87d29cvqfu dot fsf at codesourcery dot com> <m3389xbdk5 dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <m3a9439y60 dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <m361er9drc dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <m31tpd32xx dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <87y4rfjm9h dot fsf at codesourcery dot com>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Doug,
> Sorry for the delayed response.
>
>> 2014-11-08 Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
>>
>> PR symtab/17564
>> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order.exp: New file.
>> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order.c: New file.
>> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order-1.c: New file.
>> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order-shlib-1.c: New file.
>
> These new .c files need copyright headers.
These files are so trivial, I left them out.
[The .exp file *does* have a copyright header.]
I know the contribution checklist page mentions always adding them,
even if the GNU standards only require them for legally significant
headers.
It's not clear that that is intended to apply in particular cases such as these.
[I can add them, but establishing some clarity would be nice.]